1 00:00:04,470 --> 00:00:02,149 the healer was verb 2 00:00:07,510 --> 00:00:04,480 verbally instructed with cues to start 3 00:00:09,910 --> 00:00:07,520 and stop the distance intentionality 4 00:00:12,150 --> 00:00:09,920 in a random pattern 5 00:00:13,830 --> 00:00:12,160 so they they were told to start and stop 6 00:00:19,990 --> 00:00:13,840 in a random pattern 7 00:00:27,189 --> 00:00:23,269 now the scanner was a 1.5 tesla 8 00:00:30,550 --> 00:00:27,199 this is a very strong magnetic field 9 00:00:31,990 --> 00:00:30,560 mr imaging system 10 00:00:33,590 --> 00:00:32,000 i might mention that there are some 11 00:00:35,990 --> 00:00:33,600 people that told us 12 00:00:38,470 --> 00:00:36,000 that they lose their psychic abilities 13 00:00:40,069 --> 00:00:38,480 when they go on an mri scanner because 14 00:00:42,869 --> 00:00:40,079 the magnetic field is too strong and 15 00:00:44,790 --> 00:00:42,879 they lose their psychic abilities so 16 00:00:48,470 --> 00:00:44,800 i've heard that before 17 00:00:50,869 --> 00:00:48,480 but anyway with um 1.5 mr imaging system 18 00:00:51,910 --> 00:00:50,879 we can get very nice images 19 00:00:53,990 --> 00:00:51,920 and uh 20 00:00:55,990 --> 00:00:54,000 for those of you involved in brain 21 00:00:58,549 --> 00:00:56,000 imaging these these will make sense to 22 00:01:00,709 --> 00:00:58,559 you if you're involved in brain imaging 23 00:01:03,110 --> 00:01:00,719 these parameters are important to get 24 00:01:05,350 --> 00:01:03,120 good contrast in the brain 25 00:01:09,270 --> 00:01:05,360 related to the blood oxygen level 26 00:01:15,590 --> 00:01:11,910 so then we did fmri analysis of the on 27 00:01:18,870 --> 00:01:15,600 off patterns dictated to the healer 28 00:01:20,950 --> 00:01:18,880 we used fsl from oxford the uk to 29 00:01:23,190 --> 00:01:20,960 analyze the the signal 30 00:01:25,510 --> 00:01:23,200 we have single subject analysis and 31 00:01:32,149 --> 00:01:25,520 group analysis 32 00:01:33,109 --> 00:01:32,159 after we do the single subject analysis 33 00:01:33,910 --> 00:01:33,119 and 34 00:01:36,069 --> 00:01:33,920 then 35 00:01:38,550 --> 00:01:36,079 the results show that in the group 36 00:01:39,749 --> 00:01:38,560 analysis we had two very significant 37 00:01:41,429 --> 00:01:39,759 clusters 38 00:01:42,310 --> 00:01:41,439 now let me tell you again what this 39 00:01:44,789 --> 00:01:42,320 means 40 00:01:47,109 --> 00:01:44,799 this is a group analysis 41 00:01:48,870 --> 00:01:47,119 of the receivers who are inside the 42 00:01:51,590 --> 00:01:48,880 scanner 43 00:01:53,270 --> 00:01:51,600 who are receiving signals from the 44 00:01:55,749 --> 00:01:53,280 healers 45 00:01:58,950 --> 00:01:55,759 so all of the signal comes from the the 46 00:02:02,230 --> 00:01:58,960 receivers not not the senders 47 00:02:03,990 --> 00:02:02,240 and so the the receivers again are are 48 00:02:06,230 --> 00:02:04,000 able to receive the signal from the 49 00:02:08,790 --> 00:02:06,240 healers and we're able to measure the 50 00:02:11,029 --> 00:02:08,800 signal in their brain and we get these 51 00:02:14,470 --> 00:02:11,039 two significant clusters 52 00:02:16,949 --> 00:02:14,480 with a probability of false positive 8.5 53 00:02:17,750 --> 00:02:16,959 times 10 to the minus ninth 54 00:02:23,510 --> 00:02:17,760 so 55 00:02:26,150 --> 00:02:23,520 that's 10 to the minus ninth is a 56 00:02:28,150 --> 00:02:26,160 significant significance and we got 57 00:02:29,670 --> 00:02:28,160 another cluster of a little less uh 58 00:02:32,470 --> 00:02:29,680 significance 59 00:02:33,110 --> 00:02:32,480 uh and so so we can test the probability 60 00:02:35,110 --> 00:02:33,120 of 61 00:02:36,550 --> 00:02:35,120 using these techniques now this this is 62 00:02:38,869 --> 00:02:36,560 kind of blurry 63 00:02:41,030 --> 00:02:38,879 i have better images than these but 64 00:02:42,869 --> 00:02:41,040 we this is one of the clusters in the 65 00:02:45,190 --> 00:02:42,879 back of the brain 66 00:02:47,990 --> 00:02:45,200 uh that they again this is the group 67 00:02:49,910 --> 00:02:48,000 analysis cluster 68 00:02:53,270 --> 00:02:49,920 and again this is a part of the brain 69 00:02:54,390 --> 00:02:53,280 involved in visual processing and in 70 00:02:56,150 --> 00:02:54,400 imagery 71 00:02:58,150 --> 00:02:56,160 so this is a part of the brain involved 72 00:03:01,190 --> 00:02:58,160 in image processing 73 00:03:02,550 --> 00:03:01,200 even though they got no stimulus except 74 00:03:04,390 --> 00:03:02,560 from the healer 75 00:03:05,990 --> 00:03:04,400 the healer was the only person giving 76 00:03:07,430 --> 00:03:06,000 the stimulus 77 00:03:10,550 --> 00:03:07,440 and they got a signal here in the back 78 00:03:14,630 --> 00:03:12,309 and then we also got a signal in the 79 00:03:17,350 --> 00:03:14,640 front of the brain 80 00:03:21,430 --> 00:03:17,360 in the frontal regions 81 00:03:23,509 --> 00:03:21,440 and so the angular anterior cingulate 82 00:03:25,509 --> 00:03:23,519 is involved in 83 00:03:29,750 --> 00:03:25,519 attention 84 00:03:31,750 --> 00:03:29,760 stimulus so so that's one of the parts 85 00:03:34,390 --> 00:03:31,760 of the brain and also the frontal 86 00:03:37,350 --> 00:03:34,400 regions are involved in a lot of higher 87 00:03:39,910 --> 00:03:37,360 order cognitive processing 88 00:03:41,589 --> 00:03:39,920 so we we get a lot of higher order um 89 00:03:42,869 --> 00:03:41,599 level of 90 00:03:46,149 --> 00:03:42,879 of 91 00:03:48,710 --> 00:03:46,159 cognitive processing including language 92 00:03:51,110 --> 00:03:48,720 so we get a lot of frontal areas uh 93 00:03:52,229 --> 00:03:51,120 involved in language 94 00:03:53,910 --> 00:03:52,239 and so 95 00:03:54,789 --> 00:03:53,920 when we map 96 00:03:56,710 --> 00:03:54,799 those 97 00:03:58,550 --> 00:03:56,720 clusters these are all the different 98 00:04:01,270 --> 00:03:58,560 regions that we get 99 00:04:08,229 --> 00:04:01,280 of activation from those 100 00:04:11,750 --> 00:04:10,149 okay so here's another paper that we 101 00:04:13,509 --> 00:04:11,760 published 102 00:04:15,509 --> 00:04:13,519 again in the journal of alternative and 103 00:04:16,469 --> 00:04:15,519 complementary medicine 104 00:04:18,390 --> 00:04:16,479 and 105 00:04:20,949 --> 00:04:18,400 this was one of the first papers we 106 00:04:23,270 --> 00:04:20,959 published on just a couple of case 107 00:04:25,749 --> 00:04:23,280 reports so the last 108 00:04:28,310 --> 00:04:25,759 details that i showed you involved 11 109 00:04:32,150 --> 00:04:28,320 pairs of subjects whereas this was only 110 00:04:36,870 --> 00:04:34,950 and again we were showed signal in the 111 00:04:39,670 --> 00:04:36,880 back of the brain 112 00:04:41,590 --> 00:04:39,680 and here's the time domain correlation 113 00:04:44,550 --> 00:04:41,600 of that signal 114 00:04:46,870 --> 00:04:44,560 so we we can plot the time course of the 115 00:04:49,749 --> 00:04:46,880 brain signal as a function of time 116 00:04:52,230 --> 00:04:49,759 as they're being as the 117 00:04:53,510 --> 00:04:52,240 person outside the scanner is sending 118 00:04:56,070 --> 00:04:53,520 the stimulus 119 00:04:59,030 --> 00:04:56,080 with in this case with uh the per the 120 00:05:01,270 --> 00:04:59,040 sender was getting checkerboard flicker 121 00:05:03,430 --> 00:05:01,280 board pattern 122 00:05:06,150 --> 00:05:03,440 so in this case it was not a healer it 123 00:05:08,950 --> 00:05:06,160 was this it was just a sender 124 00:05:10,950 --> 00:05:08,960 that was watching a checkerboard flicker 125 00:05:12,710 --> 00:05:10,960 pattern that was randomly going on and 126 00:05:14,310 --> 00:05:12,720 off 127 00:05:16,469 --> 00:05:14,320 and here again we get 128 00:05:21,189 --> 00:05:16,479 activation in the and the occipital 129 00:05:26,390 --> 00:05:23,510 okay now some of these same people also 130 00:05:28,870 --> 00:05:26,400 we did eeg analysis 131 00:05:32,070 --> 00:05:28,880 now the difference with eeg 132 00:05:34,790 --> 00:05:32,080 is that both the sender and the receiver 133 00:05:37,510 --> 00:05:34,800 were hooked up to the cap 134 00:05:39,830 --> 00:05:37,520 they all got this cap with a 135 00:05:41,749 --> 00:05:39,840 16 channels of uh 136 00:05:43,909 --> 00:05:41,759 eeg recording 137 00:05:45,430 --> 00:05:43,919 and in the and in this case we could 138 00:05:46,230 --> 00:05:45,440 record both 139 00:05:54,710 --> 00:05:46,240 the 140 00:05:59,830 --> 00:05:57,270 and we published this liana stannis was 141 00:06:03,189 --> 00:05:59,840 first author on this paper 142 00:06:06,309 --> 00:06:03,199 and in this case we were measuring eeg 143 00:06:08,710 --> 00:06:06,319 evidence of correlated signals 144 00:06:10,870 --> 00:06:08,720 and this is the setup that we had at 145 00:06:13,590 --> 00:06:10,880 baster university 146 00:06:15,029 --> 00:06:13,600 so we had one subject positioned in one 147 00:06:18,390 --> 00:06:15,039 room 148 00:06:20,469 --> 00:06:18,400 and he's he's watching a visual stimulus 149 00:06:22,309 --> 00:06:20,479 we have uh the control center and then 150 00:06:23,590 --> 00:06:22,319 we have another subject 151 00:06:25,749 --> 00:06:23,600 uh 152 00:06:27,430 --> 00:06:25,759 physically isolated from this other 153 00:06:29,430 --> 00:06:27,440 subject 154 00:06:31,029 --> 00:06:29,440 and at one point only one of the 155 00:06:32,830 --> 00:06:31,039 subjects is getting 156 00:06:39,670 --> 00:06:32,840 a 157 00:06:43,909 --> 00:06:40,550 so 158 00:06:47,350 --> 00:06:43,919 i i really like alpha waves because 159 00:06:50,070 --> 00:06:47,360 i've actually used alpha wave therapy 160 00:06:53,909 --> 00:06:50,080 in some of our patients with multiple 161 00:06:55,510 --> 00:06:53,919 sclerosis so i like alpha waves and i 162 00:06:58,070 --> 00:06:55,520 will 163 00:07:00,710 --> 00:06:58,080 show you the results so dean rayden 164 00:07:03,909 --> 00:07:00,720 suggested a technique for us to use 165 00:07:05,830 --> 00:07:03,919 to correlate the difference between eeg 166 00:07:08,070 --> 00:07:05,840 signal between the senders and the 167 00:07:09,990 --> 00:07:08,080 receivers 168 00:07:12,309 --> 00:07:10,000 so we use that technique 169 00:07:15,830 --> 00:07:12,319 and we got a regression 170 00:07:18,309 --> 00:07:15,840 with a significance of 0.000 171 00:07:21,510 --> 00:07:18,319 0.011 172 00:07:23,990 --> 00:07:21,520 so this is a regression analysis 173 00:07:27,990 --> 00:07:24,000 between the sender signal and the 174 00:07:32,950 --> 00:07:30,870 and so when you do a correlation 175 00:07:34,870 --> 00:07:32,960 it's kind of scattered 176 00:07:37,830 --> 00:07:34,880 but there is a significant correlation 177 00:07:39,350 --> 00:07:37,840 between the senders and the receivers 178 00:07:41,189 --> 00:07:39,360 so the pink line is kind of the 179 00:07:43,670 --> 00:07:41,199 regression line 180 00:07:46,950 --> 00:07:43,680 and all these individual dots 181 00:07:50,550 --> 00:07:46,960 is one dot from the the sender receiver 182 00:07:56,150 --> 00:07:53,990 so this was a significant effect 183 00:07:58,309 --> 00:07:56,160 correlating signals between the senders 184 00:08:00,629 --> 00:07:58,319 and the receivers 185 00:08:04,150 --> 00:08:00,639 who were isolated isolated from one 186 00:08:08,629 --> 00:08:06,390 but now the the group again in the group 187 00:08:10,070 --> 00:08:08,639 at baster university helped us to choose 188 00:08:12,230 --> 00:08:10,080 these people 189 00:08:13,510 --> 00:08:12,240 who who claim to have a connection with 190 00:08:15,430 --> 00:08:13,520 their partner 191 00:08:17,749 --> 00:08:15,440 so these people claim to have a 192 00:08:19,909 --> 00:08:17,759 connection 193 00:08:20,950 --> 00:08:19,919 and so some of them are more gifted than 194 00:08:22,950 --> 00:08:20,960 others 195 00:08:25,830 --> 00:08:22,960 and they could repeat the effect over 196 00:08:28,869 --> 00:08:25,840 and over again whereas some of them had 197 00:08:31,589 --> 00:08:28,879 more of a weak correlation 198 00:08:34,630 --> 00:08:31,599 so just as as with everything you have 199 00:08:38,550 --> 00:08:34,640 the gifted and then the semi-gifted 200 00:08:42,389 --> 00:08:40,389 so these findings support previous 201 00:08:45,509 --> 00:08:42,399 research on distance healing suggesting 202 00:08:47,269 --> 00:08:45,519 that human intentions may direct may 203 00:08:49,350 --> 00:08:47,279 directly affect others in ways that are 204 00:08:51,670 --> 00:08:49,360 not entirely understood 205 00:08:55,910 --> 00:08:51,680 but with a functional imaging and with 206 00:08:58,790 --> 00:08:55,920 eeg we can we can study these effects 207 00:09:01,269 --> 00:08:58,800 and we can measure a signal in their 208 00:09:01,279 --> 00:09:16,230 so i'll stop with that 209 00:09:16,240 --> 00:09:24,790 okay 210 00:09:24,800 --> 00:09:30,070 we have time for quite a few questions 211 00:09:33,829 --> 00:09:31,670 you mentioned at the beginning of your 212 00:09:35,910 --> 00:09:33,839 talk that uh you when you had us raise 213 00:09:38,230 --> 00:09:35,920 our right hand that would have left 214 00:09:40,150 --> 00:09:38,240 brain stimulation right 215 00:09:41,670 --> 00:09:40,160 i had been to 216 00:09:44,150 --> 00:09:41,680 kind of a healing demonstration some 217 00:09:45,590 --> 00:09:44,160 years ago with donna eden and she chose 218 00:09:47,350 --> 00:09:45,600 people in the audience to demonstrate a 219 00:09:48,710 --> 00:09:47,360 principle and she said they had 220 00:09:52,550 --> 00:09:48,720 homolateral 221 00:09:53,750 --> 00:09:52,560 means your right brain is working with 222 00:09:57,030 --> 00:09:53,760 your right hand